Did she really just say that?

Marian Cotillard, winner of Best Actress of the Year at the Oscars for her role in "La Vie en Rose" (appropriately an anagram of "Eloise Raven", as it is a film about Eloise Piaf who was often known as the Raucous Raven due to her extraordinary singing voice) announced during her acceptance speech, rather rudely I thought, that "It is true, there is some mentals in this city."

Green? Don't bank on it.

Having noticed HSBC focussing on how green they were trying to be in their recent advertising campaign (including their "sale" ... how can a bank have a sale??), I realised that they obviously had something very important to tell me when I received 5 pages of typed A4 plus an explanatory leaflet a few days ago.
So, the letter was to do with my overdraft facility. I have had an overdraft facility with HSBC ever since I was at university, and nothing has changed about it for at least 10 years.
Blah, blah, blah, overdraft, blah, blah, blah, review, blah, blah, blah, interest rate, blah, blah, blah ... Ah, here it is ... Your overdraft facility will remain the same.
Now HSBC, don't you think you could have mentioned this on one corner of my statement? emailed me about it? left a message on the internet banking system I regularly log in to? Or even just presume that I would realise that if not told of any changes then I would realise that the status quo remains?
I suppose they know full well that inertia will keep me as their customer, so this needn't really concern them.

Giving drivers a brake

I've been thinking about car taxing. With petrol tax becoming increasingly difficult to put up due to the ridiculous levels already reached, the government is understandably looking to other ways to increase the tax burden on drivers. Often we hear of road pricing being mooted in various forms, but I think that that is a rather untargeted tax. The real scourge of driving is wasting petrol. Petrol tax already penalises wasting of petrol through using an engine that is unnecessarily powerful, so now we need to penalise the other great way of wasting petrol: Braking.
Every time you brake you are wasting the petrol just burnt, so surely we can deduct directly from drivers every time their brake pedal is depressed. I've noticed in motorway driving it is not necessary to brake more than about once every fifty miles, though some drivers seem obsessed with whizzing up so close behind others and then jamming their brakes on. Braking tax would also target the other scourges of the driving world: the school run drivers, the nip down the shops drivers and the tailgaters.

Yummy

Today a delicious lunchtime snack for you to enjoy before the end of the sprout season.

You will need :
12 small/medium brussell sprouts.
Fake butter.
Pinch of salt.
Two slices bread with bits in.
West country cheddar dip.
Packaged ham slices.

Cut sprouts into quarters.
Add sprouts to lightly salted boiling water and simmer for 5 mins.
Melt fake butter spread in frying pan.
Fry sprouts for 5 minutes.
Butter bread.
Add Ham to one slice of bread.
Add West Country Cheddar spread to other slice of bread.
Spread sprouts out on top of the ham.
Close your sandwich and enjoy.

Rules clarification required (iii)

I've been watching a bit of tennis recently and I've noticed that accurately deciding whether a ball was 'in' or 'out' seems to have become a major issue, with Hawkeye playing its part, when someone can justify the cash spent to implement it.
But is the following 'in' or 'out' in a singles game?
Apologies for the colour and accuracy of the picture ... the red bit is the contact the ball makes with the ground while bouncing. At first look it would appear to be out; it has bounced just missing the junction between the baseline and the sideline. However, as far as the baseline line judge is concerned it was clearly in, and likewise the sideline judge looking straight up his line would call it in. Could the umpire overrule? Unlikely that he could see it clearly enough to be sure, and even if he could, how can you 'overrule' if neither of the line judge has made a mistake that needs to be over-ruled.
If it is on a Hawkeye court, would Hawkeye rule it out? If Hawkeye is not employed, what is the correct decision?